Follow

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Ramaphosa Challenges Phala Phala Report

President Cyril Ramaphosa challenges Phala Phala report
President Cyril Ramaphosa President Cyril Ramaphosa
Ramaphosa Challenges Phala Phala Report

President Cyril Ramaphosa has vowed to challenge the Section 89 independent panel report, describing it as flawed and disagreeing with its findings that there is prima facie evidence that he had violated his oath of office.

The report, which was submitted in December 2022, found that Ramaphosa may have breached the Constitution and his oath of office in relation to the Phala Phala farm saga. However, Ramaphosa has consistently maintained that he has not committed a crime and has not misused public money.

Background to the Phala Phala Saga

The Phala Phala saga began in June 2022, when it was alleged that Ramaphosa had been involved in a cover-up of a burglary at his Phala Phala farm in Limpopo. The incident sparked a national outcry, with many calling for Ramaphosa’s resignation.

Advertisement

According to the South African Government website, the Section 89 independent panel was established to investigate the allegations against Ramaphosa. The panel’s report was subsequently submitted to Parliament, which then voted to reject the report.

Constitutional Court Ruling

However, the Constitutional Court recently ruled that Parliament’s handling of the report was unconstitutional and invalid. The court ordered that the matter be referred back to Parliament’s impeachment committee for further consideration.

As noted on Wikipedia, the Constitution of South Africa is the supreme law of the land, and any breaches of the Constitution can have serious consequences.

Here are some key points to consider:

  • The Section 89 independent panel report found that Ramaphosa may have breached the Constitution and his oath of office.
  • Ramaphosa has consistently maintained that he has not committed a crime and has not misused public money.
  • The Constitutional Court has ruled that Parliament’s handling of the report was unconstitutional and invalid.

Ramaphosa has stated that he will challenge the report on an expeditious basis, citing concerns about the process and the findings. The matter is likely to have significant implications for South African politics and the rule of law.

Add a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Advertisement