Follow

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

McKenzie vs James: Minister Faces Intimidation Charges

Minister Gayton McKenzie faces intimidation charges after comments made during a Facebook Live broadcast
Gayton McKenzie and Dereleen James Gayton McKenzie and Dereleen James
McKenzie vs James: Minister Faces Intimidation Charges

A dramatic escalation in the saga between Sports, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie and ACTIONSA MP Dereleen James has seen James open a case of intimidation against the minister. This comes after McKenzie made comments during a Facebook Live broadcast on Sunday, which James felt were threatening and intimidating.

According to James, McKenzie’s remarks, which included references to his security detail and the phrase ‘Die pad is lank’, made her feel exposed and vulnerable. She has been investigating allegations linking McKenzie and his deputy president, Kenny Kunene, to drug cartels in the Western Cape.

Intimidation Allegations

James described the intimidation as evident, explaining that members of the Patriotic Alliance have been allegedly linked to drug cartels in the region. She emphasized that she is simply doing her job by probing these allegations and holding those in power accountable.

Advertisement

The Patriotic Alliance has hit back, with McKenzie submitting a formal complaint against James with Parliament’s Joint Committee on Ethics and Members’ Interests. The complaint argues that James mischaracterized McKenzie’s remarks and created a false narrative of threat and intimidation.

Drug Cartel Allegations

McKenzie’s spokesperson, Steve Motale, said the minister’s comments were intended to highlight the implausibility of the drug-dealing allegations against him, not to threaten James. Motale explained that McKenzie’s reference to his security detail was meant to demonstrate the practical impossibility of the allegations being made against him.

As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how Parliament’s Joint Committee on Ethics and Members’ Interests will handle the complaint. In the meantime, James remains resolute in her determination to hold those in power accountable, despite feeling intimidated by McKenzie’s comments. For more information on the role of the Joint Committee on Ethics and Members’ Interests, visit the South African Parliament website.

Some key points to consider in this saga include:

  • The allegations linking McKenzie and his deputy president to drug cartels in the Western Cape
  • James’ determination to probe these allegations and hold those in power accountable
  • The intimidation charges brought against McKenzie by James
  • The complaint submitted by McKenzie against James with Parliament’s Joint Committee on Ethics and Members’ Interests
Add a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Advertisement